top of page

Continuity: Use of a Seal


Tip 38: One of the best ways to control wet-bath simulator alcohol standard continuity is to use alphanumeric police seals and record their numbers/codes in the Alcohol Standard Log (both outgoing and incoming), in the solution change officer's notes (both outgoing and incoming), and in the subject breath test QT officer's notes. A seal between the upper housing and the jar ensures that no one has tampered with the solution between the time the seal is applied and the time it is removed. Optionally, as in the image below, particulars of the alcohol standard used, date/time and solution change officer can be entered directly onto the seal. Note the seal number code at the very bottom of the image.

This image was captured by a professional photographer retained by the defence. This type of seal and the information it contains cannot be seen with any acceptable degree of resolution in a breath room video recording. Consent attendance of a professional photographer, in a detachment, to take such images, with the consent of all parties, facilitates examination and cross-examination of police witnesses in the courtroom, respecting local wet-bath simulator standard operating procedures and is a good alternative to a Criminal Code Court-ordered view. Please see R. v. W. at Milton, 2013 ONCJ 407 paragraph 5 where the Court indicates "I ordered that the defence be permitted a view of the Intoxilyzer room in which the tests had been conducted on Mr. W". In the absence of such images, the defence can only guess at the type of information on the seal and method of attachment. Having an image of the seal is important for cross-examination of the QT if as in R. v. W., the QT indicates that they obtained information as to alcohol standard identity from a seal.

Wet-bath simulator with alphanumeric seal
Image taken by defence photographer. Note seal, mercury thermometer, and also RS 232 cable attached at back.

The information written on a seal, such as this one may, of course, be reliable or not reliable, depending on whether or not the seal is properly attached and whether the solution change QT followed protocol correctly.

An astute defence counsel will examine police notes and the Alcohol Standard Log at the prior solution change, at the time of the subject tests, and at the time of the subsequent solution change to determine if the seal (the particular alphanumeric number) was observed to be intact. Alcohol Standard Logs should always display both incoming seal numbers (immediately prior to solution change) and outgoing seal numbers (immediately after solution change). The seal numbers should match other entries in the Alcohol Standard Log.

The question needs to be asked throughout Ontario: Why don't all police services use simulator alphnumeric seals to control continuity?

Comments


If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page