top of page

Ambient Interferents Compromise Reliability of Control Tests

Updated: Oct 5, 2022


Tip 48: The reliability of control tests using the alcohol standard in a wet-bath #duisimulator may be compromised by the presence in the breath room air of an interferent, if the approved instrument confuses the interferent as ethyl alcohol. In the same way that ambient ethyl alcohol can raise the zero baseline, so can an ambient interferent. Interferents may include paint, cleaning fluids, fingerprint cleanup fluids, and chemicals on the clothing or breath of the accused or the qualified technician.

Greater research needs to be done on the subject by scientists at the Centre of Forensic Sciences, by the Alcohol Test Committee, and by scientists in private practice. Further inquiries need to be made of the manufacturer as to the exact bandwidth of the IR filters on the 8000C.

The video below is NOT expert evidence. It is provided as an aid to defence counsel in understanding the problem of chemical "interferents" in evidentiary breath testing generally, and wet-bath simulator cal checks specifically. We need to discuss these issues and obtain better answers from the scientific community.

The following data was used during argument in R v O and was filed as part of Exhibits 2 and 9 on the Application. The data was originally filed in R v H at Brampton. The data reveal that the instrument flagged an "interferent detect" message during stand-alone calibration checks. Unless the alcohol standard from the lab, or the wet-bath simulator cleaned/rinsed/lubricated by a QT, was the source of the interferent, the cause of this fail must have been the ambient air in the breath room.

COBRA data showing Interferent Detect during Control Checks
Excerpt from Exhiibit 2 in R v O

Breath rooms frequently contain cleaning equipment associated with fingerprinting. The following is an image captured in [a local] police breath room by the professional photographer hired by the defence in R v G. Notice the reference to D-Limonene under First Aid Treatment. D-Limonene is a problem interferent for the 5000C.

Hand  cleaning product containing D-limonene.
Image taken by defence photographer in a GTA breath room

With respect to the Intoxilyzer 8000C, defence lawyers should be watching for evidence of ethyl ether or di-ethyl ether in the breath room. Some office cleaners use these dangerous chemicals for deep cleaning without dilution. These chemicals are also commonly used by diesel mechanics, personal watercraft mechanics, and hobbyists.


Comments


If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page