top of page

What is Accuracy? Techniques to Enhance Accuracy

Updated: Aug 9, 2022




Paragraph 2.13 of the VIM
Excerpt from the VIM: Vocabulaire International de Metrologie

Purpose:


To develop the concept that, in metrology, accuracy is not a number. It is something that we work towards. It does not make sense to say that a particular measurement result "is accurate". We can take certain steps to encourage accuracy such as using the mean or average of many results. The proper approach is provide a measurement result that is as accurate as possible together with a statement of the uncertainty of the measurement.

Note that Hodgson, in the article referred to in St-Onge, defines "accuracy" as:

Definition of "accuracy" in Hodgson paper
Excerpts from Brian T. Hodgson, "The Validity of Evidential Breath Testing" Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. Vol. 41 No. 2 (2008) pp. 83-96

Q. I see. Now, I just want to ask you, in science, can you help me with what’s meant by an average or a mean? A. That’s the same word, meaning that it’s an average of the numerical values divided by the number of measurements. Q. I see. So, sometimes as a scientist, if you’re running an experiment and you get a large number of values, possible values, you might take the average of those values in order to try and give as accurate of a measurement result as you can, as a scientist? A. Correct. So, if you made eight measurements on that one analysis, you would take all those analyses, the quantitative result, and divide it by the number of measurements to get the average of all those results. Q. So, if we’ve got the truck on the weigh scale at the side of Highway 400 and there are 50 different measurement results, of – they average out to 177,500 of whatever the units is, whether it’s paper clips or whether it’s grams, or whether it’s kilo-paper-clips, or whether it’s kilograms. A. Okay. Q. The 177,500 we might consider to be an average of those 50 possible results. In other words, the measurement result that we take as good scientists would be to take all of the various numbers that we get that might


surround 177,500 and we work out an average of them, a mean. A. Well, you would take all the numerical values, divided by the number of measurements and that would give you the mean or average result of 177,500. Q. And we do that to enhance accuracy. A. Yes. Q. Now.... A. There’s variability associated with any measurement that’s made. Q. All right. I understand that, and we’ll get to precision later. A. Okay. Q. But for now, I just want to get a concept. A. That’s what that concept is. Q. I want to get a concept of what a mean is, what an average is, and I think you’ve explained that.




If you are a member of the public, please don't attempt to use what you see or read at this site in Court. It is not evidence. The author is not a scientist. The author has a great deal of experience in cross-examining scientists about these issues, but the author is not a scientist. Hire a criminal lawyer in private practice in Ontario. Your lawyer can retain an expert. The author is a retired lawyer, not a lawyer in private practice. Read the statement of the purpose of this web site below.

© 2025 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd.

This site has been built by Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.

Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.

Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.

bottom of page